Casey Robinson v. Kathy White and Shana Peeler

Robinson · United States District Court for the District of South Carolina · November 21, 2025 · No. 5:25-12935-BHH-KDW

Summary

The magistrate judge recommends dismissing Casey Robinson’s civil rights action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because the plaintiff failed to maintain a current address and could not be contacted. The Report and Recommendation explains that the case may proceed if Robinson provides a current address within the objection period and advises the parties of their right to file specific written objections.

Holdings

  1. The magistrate judge recommended that the action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Plaintiff failed to keep the court apprised of his address, causing the court's order to be returned as undeliverable and preventing service and communication regarding the case.
  2. In the absence of timely specific objections, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record before accepting the recommendation.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Plaintiff failed to maintain a current address and failed to provide proper service information.
  2. What standard of review the district court should apply to the Report and Recommendation if the parties do not file timely specific objections.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co., 416 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)(followed)
  • Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985)(followed)
  • United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…