Summary
The document is a Report and Recommendation addressing Gregory D. Daniels’s second petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The magistrate judge recommends dismissal because the petition is successive and was filed without authorization from the Fourth Circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).
Holdings
- A petitioner may not file a second or successive § 2254 petition in the district court without first obtaining authorization from the appropriate court of appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).
- Absent pre-filing authorization from the Fourth Circuit, the district court lacks jurisdiction to consider the successive § 2254 petition.
Questions Presented
- Whether the present § 2254 petition is a second or successive habeas petition requiring authorization from the Fourth Circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) before filing in the district court.
- Whether the district court has jurisdiction to consider the successive petition absent the required appellate authorization.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (13)
- Daniels v. Warden, C/A No.: 5:18-3064-RMG-KDW (D.S.C. Aug. 7, 2019)(followed)
- Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v. Coil, 887 F.2d 1236, 1239 (4th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir. 1978)(followed)
- Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)(followed)
- Fine v. City of N.Y., 529 F.2d 70, 74 (2d Cir. 1975)(followed)
- Weller v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 901 F.2d 387, 390-91 (4th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- In re Vial, 115 F.3d 1192, 1194 (4th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- In re Williams, 330 F.3d 277 (4th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- In re Fowlkes, 326 F.3d 542 (4th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…