Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation and dismissed Timothy Augustus Ward’s bankruptcy appeal without prejudice. The dismissal was based on failure to prosecute and failure to timely file a statement of issues and designation of the record, and any pending motions were deemed moot.
Holdings
- When a party fails to file timely and specific objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court is not required to conduct de novo review and need only determine whether clear error appears on the face of the record.
- A bankruptcy appeal may be dismissed without prejudice when the appellant fails to prosecute and fails to comply with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and a district court order requiring a statement of issues and designation of the record.
- An untimely filing that neither constitutes a proper specific objection nor timely designates the record does not cure the appellant's prior procedural noncompliance.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's recommendation in the absence of timely and specific objections.
- Whether the bankruptcy appeal should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the district court's order.
- Whether Ward's untimely Statement of Issue cured his prior procedural deficiencies.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976)(followed)
- United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 & n.4 (4th Cir. 1984)(followed)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147 (1985)(followed)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…