Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and dismisses Jeffrey Rahim Colberth’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition without prejudice as successive and unauthorized by the Fourth Circuit. The court also denies a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- Because Petitioner filed no specific objections, the district court was not required to conduct de novo review of particular portions of the report or explain its adoption of the recommendation.
- A successive petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is subject to dismissal when the petitioner has not obtained an order from the appropriate court of appeals authorizing the district court to consider it.
- A certificate of appealability should be denied because Petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's recommendation when Petitioner filed no objections.
- Whether the § 2254 petition should be dismissed as an unauthorized successive petition.
- Whether Petitioner was entitled to a certificate of appealability.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (6)
- Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976)(followed)
- Carniewski v. W. Virginia Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 974 F.2d 1330 (4th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)(followed)
- Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…