Justin R. Mitchell v. Samuel H. Ervin

Mitchell v. Ervin · United States District Court for the District of South Carolina · March 19, 2026 · No. 4:25-cv-5288-BHH

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and dismisses Plaintiff Justin R. Mitchell’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Court reviews the recommendation for clear error because no objections were filed and finds no clear error.

Holdings

  1. When no specific objections are filed, the district court reviews the magistrate judge's recommendation for clear error rather than conducting de novo review.
  2. The action was properly dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Plaintiff failed to comply with the magistrate judge's order to provide a status report and appeared to have abandoned the action.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's report and recommendation when no objections were filed.
  2. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (2)

  • Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976)(followed)
  • Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…