Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina adopts a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in Kevin LaPatrick Fowler’s pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court dismisses all claims other than the excessive-force claim against Defendant Jerrad Smith with prejudice, without leave to amend, and without issuance and service of process.
Holdings
- When no specific objections are filed, the district court reviews the magistrate judge's recommendation for clear error rather than conducting de novo review.
- The non-excessive-force claims were properly dismissed for failure to state a claim, with prejudice, without leave for further amendment, and without issuance and service of process.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should review the magistrate judge's Report for clear error when Plaintiff filed no specific objections.
- Whether the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss all claims other than the excessive-force claim should be adopted.
- Whether the non-excessive-force claims should be dismissed with prejudice, without leave to amend, and without issuance and service of process.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976)(followed)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…