Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina adopts a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation because the plaintiff filed no objections and the court found no clear error. The court dismisses the plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice and without issuance or service of process for failure to allege a plausible claim against certain defendants and failure to make allegations concerning another defendant.
Holdings
- When no objections are filed, the district court need only determine whether there is clear error on the face of the record before accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation.
- The action was properly dismissed without prejudice because the complaint failed to allege facts supporting a plausible § 1983 claim against Anderson and Leblanc and contained no allegations concerning Barnett.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should review and adopt the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation when no objections were filed.
- Whether the action should be dismissed because the complaint failed to allege a plausible 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Anderson and Leblanc and contained no allegations concerning Barnett.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270–71 (1976)(followed)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…