Summary
The magistrate judge recommends granting the United States Postal Service’s motion for summary judgment in Wendy D. Pate’s Federal Tort Claims Act premises-liability action. The court concludes that Pate failed to provide evidence that the government created the allegedly defective door condition or had actual or constructive knowledge of it. The recommendation also concludes that the asserted subsequent door repairs and alleged missing incident records do not establish a genuine dispute of material fact.
Holdings
- Summary judgment should be granted because Plaintiff failed to provide evidence that Defendant created the alleged dangerous condition or had actual or constructive knowledge that the door was dangerous and failed to remedy it.
- The challenged evidence did not create a genuine dispute of material fact because it did not establish that the door was defective on the incident date or that Defendant had notice of a dangerous condition.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendant was entitled to summary judgment because Plaintiff lacked evidence that Defendant created the alleged dangerous door condition or had actual or constructive knowledge of it.
- Whether Plaintiff's photographs, alleged absence of an incident report, and alleged employee statements created a genuine dispute of material fact sufficient to defeat summary judgment.
- Whether subsequent remedial measures could be used to establish negligence or a defective condition.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (14)
- Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319 (1972)(followed)
- Weller v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 901 F.2d 387 (4th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986)(followed)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 252, 255 (1986)(followed)
- Ennis v. Nat'l Ass'n of Bus. & Educ. Radio, Inc., 53 F.3d 55, 62 (4th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Latif v. The Cmty. Coll. of Baltimore, 354 F. App'x 828, 830 (4th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Corrigan v. United States, 815 F.2d 954, 955 (4th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Charleston Elec. Servs., Inc. v. Rahall, 831 S.E.2d 122, 125 (S.C. Ct. App. 2019)(followed)
- Singleton v. Sherer, 377 S.C. 185, 200, 659 S.E.2d 196, 204 (Ct. App. 2008)(followed)
- Larimore v. Carolina Power & Light, 531 S.E.2d 535, 538 (S.C. Ct. App. 2000)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…