Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Dakota denied Kara Lee Swier’s motions to appoint counsel in her pro se Title VII and Age Discrimination in Employment Act lawsuit against Unifi Aviation, LLC. The court found that Swier had demonstrated financial need and efforts to obtain counsel but appeared capable of pursuing her claims at that stage, and it provided guidance regarding service of process.
Holdings
- Appointment of counsel under Title VII is discretionary, and the plaintiff's demonstrated financial need and efforts to obtain counsel did not warrant appointment at this stage because she appeared capable of pursuing her noncomplex claims pro se.
- A pro se party is capable of arranging service, and Swier was directed to consider serving Unifi Aviation's registered agent in South Dakota under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should appoint counsel for a pro se plaintiff pursuing Title VII and Age Discrimination in Employment Act claims.
- Whether the plaintiff's financial need and efforts to obtain counsel, considered with the apparent merits and complexity of the claims, warranted appointment of counsel at that stage of the case.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Stevens v. Redwing, 146 F.3d 538, 546 (8th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Hale v. N. Little Rock Hous. Auth., 720 F.2d 996, 998 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam)(followed)
- Nelson v. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F.2d 1003, 1005 (8th Cir. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…