Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Dakota overruled Tiun D. Todd’s objections and adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, as modified. The court dismissed without prejudice Todd’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his expulsion from the Bureau of Prisons’ Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program because he failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
Holdings
- A federal prisoner bringing a § 2241 claim must fully exhaust the pertinent BOP administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court.
- The BOP's delayed response did not render the administrative remedy process unavailable or make exhaustion futile because the regulations permitted Todd to treat the absence of a timely response as a denial and pursue the next appeal within the applicable period.
- The court would not address the merits of Todd's due process and equal protection claims because the petition was subject to dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
Questions Presented
- Whether Todd's failure to fully exhaust BOP administrative remedies required dismissal of his § 2241 petition.
- Whether the BOP's delayed response rendered its administrative remedy process unavailable or made exhaustion futile.
- Whether the court should reach Todd's due process and equal protection claims concerning his expulsion from RDAP despite his failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Miller v. Redwood Toxicology Lab., Inc., 688 F.3d 928, 931 n.3 (8th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- United States v. Craft, 30 F.3d 1044, 1045 (8th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- United States v. Chappel, 208 F.3d 1069, 1069 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam)(followed)
- Kendrick v. Carlson, 995 F.2d 1440, 1447 (8th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 85, 89, 93-97 (2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…