Esli D. B.G. v. Pamela Jo Bondi, et al.

5:26-CV-05020-RAL · United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Western Division · March 16, 2026 · No. 5:26-CV-05020-RAL

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of South Dakota granted Esli D. B.G.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his federal immigration detention. The court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than the mandatory-detention provisions of § 1225(b), governed because the petitioner had been residing in the United States for many years. Because he was arrested without a warrant, the court ordered his immediate release, subject to specified conditions if he was re-arrested.

Holdings

  1. A noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection years earlier and is already residing in the country is not an alien seeking admission subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2); absent an applicable § 1226(c) exception, the detention is governed by the discretionary detention authority in § 1226(a).
  2. Section 1226(a) requires an Attorney General-issued warrant as a prerequisite to arrest and detention under that provision.
  3. When a noncitizen's detention is unauthorized under § 1226(a) because the required warrant is absent, the appropriate habeas remedy is immediate release rather than merely a bond hearing.
  4. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to adjudicate the petitioner's challenge to the lawfulness of his immigration detention.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection years earlier and was already residing in the country is subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) or discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
  2. Whether detention under § 1226(a) is authorized when immigration agents arrest the noncitizen without an arrest warrant.
  3. Whether immediate release, rather than merely a bond hearing, is the appropriate remedy for detention lacking a statutory basis under § 1226(a).
  4. Whether the district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to review the legality of the immigration detention.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (17)

  • Maldonado v. Olson, 795 F. Supp. 3d 1134, 1142-47, 1150-52 (D. Minn. 2025)(followed)
  • Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. Dec. 216 (BIA 2025)(discussed)
  • Santos M.C. v. Olson, No. 25-CV-4264, 2025 WL 3281787 (D. Minn. Nov. 25, 2025)(followed)
  • Ahmed M. v. Bondi, No. 25-cv-4711, 2026 WL 25627 (D. Minn. Jan. 5, 2026)(followed)
  • Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi, 166 F.4th 494, 499, 502-06 (5th Cir. 2026)(distinguished)
  • Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 289 (2018)(followed)
  • Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 485 (1973)(followed)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687 (2001)(followed)
  • Demore v. Kim, 538 U.S. 510, 516-18 (2003)(discussed)
  • Chogllo Chafla v. Scott, 804 F. Supp. 3d 247, 264 (D. Me. 2025)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 17.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…