Christina Juliana Johnson v. James Lydon Allred, Saxton Brown, David McDaniel, and Bryan Hendrix

No. 4:25-cv-00068-DN-PK (D. Utah Jan. 29, 2026) · United States District Court for the District of Utah · January 30, 2026 · No. 4:25-cv-00068-DN-PK

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Utah grants Christina Juliana Johnson’s motion to determine and award attorney fees and costs following the parties’ Rule 68 settlement. The court holds that the requested billing entries were not impermissibly block billed and rejects the defendants’ objections concerning hourly rates, factual research, complaint drafting, and preparation of the fee motion. The action involved alleged constitutional violations arising from Johnson’s arrest and prosecution after a vehicle accident.

Holdings

  1. A prevailing civil-rights plaintiff's fee award is calculated by multiplying reasonable hours by reasonable hourly rates, subject to reduction for hours that are unnecessary, irrelevant, duplicative, or otherwise not reasonably expended.
  2. Listing multiple tasks in one itemized time entry is not impermissible block billing; block billing occurs when counsel records total daily time without itemizing the time spent on specific tasks.
  3. Hourly rates and factual-investigation hours are compensable when supported by prevailing-market evidence and reasonably necessary to investigate and plead the civil-rights claims.
  4. Reasonable attorney fees incurred in preparing a fee application are recoverable under applicable fee-shifting authority.
  5. Necessary and reasonable out-of-pocket litigation expenses normally billed to private clients may be recovered as part of a civil-rights fee award, including expenses for indispensable public-records requests.

Questions Presented

  1. What amount of attorney fees and costs was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and the parties' Rule 68 Agreement?
  2. Whether counsel's time entries constituted impermissible block billing warranting a fee reduction.
  3. Whether the requested hourly rates, factual investigation, complaint drafting, and preparation of the fee motion were reasonably compensable.
  4. Whether plaintiff could recover $577.60 in litigation expenses, including costs associated with Government Records Access and Management Act requests.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (17)

  • Case v. Unified School District No. 233, Johnson County, Kansas, 157 F.3d 1243 (10th Cir. 1998)(followed)
  • Robinson v. City of Edmond, 160 F.3d 1275 (10th Cir. 1998)(followed)
  • Ramos v. Lamm, 713 F.2d 546 (10th Cir. 1983)(limited)
  • Carter v. Sedgwick County, Kansas, 36 F.3d 952 (10th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Mares v. Credit Bureau of Raton, 801 F.2d 1197 (10th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Cadena v. Pacesetter Corp., 224 F.3d 1203 (10th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Flying J Inc. v. Comdata Network, Inc., 322 F. App'x 610 (10th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Malloy v. Monahan, 73 F.3d 1012 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Praseuth v. Rubbermaid, Inc., 406 F.3d 1245 (10th Cir. 2005)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 17.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…