Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Utah denied Wolverine Fuels, LLC's motion to consolidate Jones v. Wolverine Fuels and Goins v. Wolverine Fuels under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a). The court concluded that coordinated discovery and case management would promote judicial economy without requiring consolidation. The court ordered the parties to submit a joint case management order and reassigned the Goins matter to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett.
Holdings
- The court denied Wolverine's motion to consolidate because, although the actions involved substantially overlapping plaintiffs and similar factual and legal questions, formal consolidation was unnecessary.
- The parties were ordered to coordinate discovery and submit a stipulated joint case management order in both actions within fourteen days.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Goins and Jones actions should be consolidated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and DUCivR 42-1.
- Whether coordinated discovery and case management could adequately serve judicial economy without formally consolidating the actions.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Shump v. Balka, 574 F.2d 1341, 1344 (10th Cir. 1978)(followed)
- Phillip M. Adams & Assocs., LLC v. Dell Inc., No. 1:05-cv-64 TS, 2008 WL 203316, at *2 (D. Utah Jan. 23, 2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…