Kinda Hooser, individually, and on behalf of the heirs of Billy Hooser, deceased v. Michael Jayne; Sierra Nevada Trucking, LLC; Valley Fine Foods; and John and Jane Does I-X

Hooser · United States District Court for the District of Utah · June 25, 2026 · No. 2:26-cv-00018-DBB-DBP

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Utah granted in part and denied in part Michael Jayne’s motion to stay a wrongful-death action pending resolution of related state criminal charges. The court stayed the case as to Jayne and Sierra Nevada Trucking, LLC, based on substantial overlap with the criminal proceeding and the risk to Jayne’s Fifth Amendment rights, but permitted discovery to proceed against Valley Fine Foods. The court declined to address the applicability of Younger abstention because the motion did not adequately analyze the doctrine.

Holdings

  1. The court declined to decide whether Younger abstention applied because Jayne invoked the doctrine without analyzing its elements or explaining why abstention was warranted.
  2. A discretionary stay was warranted under the Tenth Circuit's six-factor test because the civil and criminal cases substantially overlapped, the criminal prosecution was an indicted capital-murder case, and the combined interests of the parties, court, and public favored avoiding compelled choices implicating Jayne's Fifth Amendment rights and allowing the criminal matter to proceed first.
  3. The stay was denied as to Valley Fine Foods, and discovery could proceed on the claims against that defendant.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the federal court should abstain under the Younger doctrine because a related Utah criminal prosecution was pending.
  2. Whether the civil wrongful-death action should be stayed under the court's inherent authority while the related criminal proceeding against Jayne was pending.
  3. Whether the stay should apply to all defendants or only to Jayne and Sierra Nevada Trucking, LLC.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (19)

  • Creative Consumer Concepts, Inc. v. Kreisler, 563 F.3d 1070, 1080 (10th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Ben Ezra, Weinstein, & Co. v. Am. Online Inc., 206 F.3d 980, 987 (10th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Eze v. City of Las Cruces, 2026 WL 1121952, at *1-*2 (D.N.M. Apr. 24, 2026)(followed)
  • Span-Eng Assocs. v. Weidner, 771 F.2d 464, 468 (10th Cir. 1985)(followed)
  • Bellinsky v. Galan, 2025 WL 2047809, at *3 (10th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Elna Sefcovic, LLC v. TEP Rocky Mountain, LLC, 953 F.3d 660, 669-70 (10th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)(followed)
  • New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc. v. Council of the City of New Orleans, 491 U.S. 350, 368 (1989)(followed)
  • Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706 (1996)(distinguished)
  • N. Nat. Gas Co. v. Trans Pac. Oil Corp., 529 F.3d 1248, 1252 (10th Cir. 2008)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 19.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…