Max W. Barber v. Canyon View Federal Credit Union fka University First Federal Credit Union

Barber · United States District Court for the District of Utah · March 16, 2026 · No. 2:25-cv-01087

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Utah dismissed Max W. Barber’s appeal as moot after the property subject to an order granting in rem relief from the automatic stay was sold at foreclosure and title was conveyed to Canyon View Federal Credit Union. The court vacated its prior dismissal order because the appeal was already moot when that order was entered and denied Barber’s motion for rehearing as moot.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Utah
Writing for the Court
Robert J. Shelby
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the District of Utah
Decision date
March 16, 2026
Docket number
2:25-cv-01087
Procedural posture
Appellant sought rehearing of the district court's order dismissing as moot his appeal from a bankruptcy court order granting in rem relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(4).
Standard of review
The court treated mootness as a subject-matter-jurisdiction issue that may be raised at any stage of the proceedings and determined whether effective relief remained available.
Precedential value
Unknown
Parties
Max W. Barber v. Canyon View Federal Credit Union fka University First Federal Credit Union
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

mootnessappellate procedureautomatic stayforeclosurebankruptcy

Practice areas

BankruptcyAppellate procedureForeclosureReal estate remedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Barber's appeal from the bankruptcy court's order granting relief from the automatic stay became moot after Barber failed to obtain a stay pending appeal and the property was sold at foreclosure.
  2. Whether the district court's prior dismissal order should be vacated because the appeal was already moot when that order was entered.
  3. Whether Barber's motion for rehearing should be granted.

Holdings

  1. An appeal of an order granting relief from the automatic stay becomes moot when the debtor fails to obtain a stay pending appeal and the creditor conducts a foreclosure sale, because the appellate court cannot grant effective relief.
  2. The prior dismissal order should be vacated because the appeal was already moot when the dismissal order was entered.
  3. The motion for rehearing was denied as moot.

Key quotations

A case is moot when it is impossible for the court to grant any effectual relief whatever to a prevailing party. (2)
This Court is powerless to rescind the foreclosure sale. (2)

Factual background

The bankruptcy court granted Canyon View in rem relief from the automatic stay as to property at 4643-4645 South Highland Drive in Salt Lake City, Utah. Barber appealed but did not obtain a stay of the order pending appeal. The property was sold at a foreclosure sale on January 23, 2026, and a trustee's deed was recorded conveying title to Canyon View.

Procedural history

Barber appealed the bankruptcy court's order granting Canyon View relief from the automatic stay concerning real property. He did not obtain a stay pending appeal, and the property was sold at foreclosure on January 23, 2026; a trustee's deed conveying title to Canyon View was subsequently recorded. The district court dismissed the appeal on February 9, 2026, and, on Barber's motion for rehearing, dismissed the appeal as moot, vacated the prior dismissal order, and denied rehearing as moot.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…