Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Utah adopted in full a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation after plaintiff Michael Hardy failed to file objections. The court denied as moot Hardy’s motions for a preliminary injunction and a protective order and dismissed the action without prejudice.
Holdings
- A party that fails to file a timely objection to a Report and Recommendation waives arguments that the recommendation was erroneous, unless the interests of justice require an exception.
- The court adopted the Report and Recommendation in full, denied the motions for a preliminary injunction and a protective order as moot, and dismissed the action without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff waived objections to the Report and Recommendation by failing to file a timely objection.
- Whether the interests of justice required the court to decline to apply the waiver rule.
- Whether the court should adopt the Report and Recommendation, deny the pending motions as moot, and dismiss the action without prejudice.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Duffield v. Jackson, 545 F.3d 1234, 1238 (10th Cir. 2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…