Rikki James, et al. v. iMoney Tools, LLC dba Tranont

Case No. 2:24-cv-00522-RJS (D. Utah Feb. 9, 2026) · United States District Court for the District of Utah · February 9, 2026 · No. 2:24-cv-00522-RJS

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Utah partially grants and partially denies Tranont’s motion for attorney fees after dismissal of a case brought by twelve minors alleging harm from contaminated dietary supplements. The court finds that guardian Rikki James acted in bad faith based on insufficient and contradictory evidentiary support, improper motive, and discovery conduct, but finds insufficient evidence of bad faith by the other guardians. The court applies the inherent-authority bad-faith exception to the American Rule and evaluates the reasonableness of the requested fees under the lodestar approach.

Holdings

  1. A court may award attorney fees under its inherent authority when a party acts in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons, but the exception to the American Rule is narrow and requires clear evidence of bad faith or improper motive.
  2. Rikki James acted in bad faith in bringing the action, as shown by the absence of factual support, contradictory evidence, failure to meaningfully participate in discovery, and messages demonstrating an improper motive.
  3. Tranont established a presumptively reasonable lodestar of $138,615.50 through adequate billing records and reasonable hourly rates, but the award required a further reduction based on the seriousness of the violation and the relative responsibility of Rikki James.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could award attorney fees under its inherent authority based on bad-faith abuse of the judicial process.
  2. Whether the evidence established bad faith by Rikki James but not by the other plaintiffs' guardians.
  3. Whether Tranont's requested attorney fees were reasonable under the lodestar method.
  4. Whether the fees should be allocated among the plaintiffs based on Rikki James's role as guardian for four of the twelve plaintiffs.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (30)

  • Farmer v. Banco Popular of N. Am., 791 F.3d 1246, 1257 (10th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • United States v. Akers, 76 F.4th 982, 993 (10th Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44-45 (1991)(followed)
  • Kornfeld v. Kornfeld, 393 F. App'x 575, 578 (10th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • United States v. McCall, 235 F.3d 1211, 1216 (10th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Sterling Energy Ltd. v. Friendly Nat'l Bank, 744 F.2d 1433, 1435, 1437 (10th Cir. 1984)(followed)
  • Mountain W. Mines, Inc. v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co., 470 F.3d 947, 954 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, 581 U.S. 101, 108-11 (2017)(followed)
  • FDIC v. Schuchmann, 319 F.3d 1247, 1250 (10th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • FTC v. Kuykendall, 466 F.3d 1149, 1152 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 30.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…