Thomas F. Daugherty v. Cottonwood Heights, a City; and John Does 1-10

Daugherty v. Cottonwood Heights · United States District Court for the District of Utah · May 19, 2026 · No. 2:23-cv-00556-DBP

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Utah grants the defendant summary judgment on the plaintiff's ADA claim alleging denial of a promotion under a "regarded as" disability theory. The court concludes that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence that the defendant regarded him as substantially limited in performing a major life activity. The court also dismisses the Title VII claims based on the plaintiff's representation that references to Title VII were scrivener's errors, while three other claims remain pending.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence that Defendant mistakenly believed he was substantially limited in performing a major life activity, including a class or broad range of jobs, and therefore could not survive summary judgment on his ADA denial-of-promotion claim.
  2. The Title VII-related claims were dismissed because Plaintiff admitted that he was not seeking Title VII remedies and that the Title VII references in the amended complaint were scrivener's errors.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff presented sufficient evidence for a reasonable factfinder to conclude that Defendant regarded him as disabled under the ADA.
  2. Whether the Title VII-related claims should be dismissed based on Plaintiff's representation that he was not pursuing Title VII remedies.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (7)

  • Johnson v. Weld County, Colo., 594 F.3d 1202, 1219 (10th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 489, 119 S. Ct. 2139, 144 L. Ed. 2d 450 (1999)(followed)
  • Coleman v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kan., 487 F. Supp. 2d 1225, 1251 (D. Kan. 2007)(followed)
  • Coleman v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., 287 F. App'x 631, 20 A.D. Cases 1466, 2008 WL 2662595 (10th Cir. 2008)(noted)
  • Justice v. Crown Cork and Seal Co., Inc., 527 F.3d 1080, 1086-87 (10th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Williams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 44 NDLR P 108, 2011 WL 6091741, at *7-*8 (D. Kan. Dec. 7, 2011)(followed)
  • E.E.O.C. v. Heartway Corp., 466 F.3d 1156, 1162 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…