Summary
The court denied Joseph Terrell Ramey's motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action concerning injuries allegedly sustained in a Pulaski County transport-van accident and subsequent medical care. The court held that the requested relief involved unrelated parties and issues and that Ramey failed to establish irreparable harm, particularly because the accident occurred more than two years earlier and he was receiving treatment. The court also certified that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith.
Holdings
- A preliminary injunction should not issue unless the movant establishes a threat of irreparable harm; the movant bears the burden of proving entitlement to the injunction under the Dataphase factors.
- A preliminary injunction is inappropriate when it seeks affirmative relief concerning matters lying wholly outside the issues in the suit or involving unrelated parties.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to a preliminary injunction under the Dataphase factors.
- Whether the requested injunctive relief was improper because it sought affirmative relief concerning matters and parties unrelated to the claims in the complaint.
- Whether Plaintiff established a threat of irreparable harm sufficient to warrant preliminary-injunction relief.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C.L. Systems, Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 113 (8th Cir. 1981) (en banc)(followed)
- Randolph v. Rodgers, 170 F.3d 850, 856 (8th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Goff v. Harper, 60 F.3d 518, 520-21 (8th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Rogers v. Scurr, 676 F.2d 1211, 1214 (8th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- DeBeers Consol. Mines Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 220 (1945)(followed)
- Owens v. Severin, Case No. 08-1418, 2008 WL 4240153 (Sept. 18, 2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…