Summary
Proposed Findings and Recommendations in a prisoner civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Eastern District of Arkansas. The magistrate judge recommends dismissal without prejudice because the Pulaski County Detention Center is not a suable person under § 1983 and the amended pleadings identify no individual wrongdoing. The recommendation also addresses potential treatment as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and certification regarding an in forma pauperis appeal.
Holdings
- The Detention Center is not a legal entity or person subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
- The amended complaint failed to state a claim because it named only the nonsuable Detention Center and alleged no action by any individual that violated Young's rights.
- The court recommended that the dismissal count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), while recognizing that the effective determination of accumulated strikes is made by a later tribunal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Pulaski County Detention Center is a suable person under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
- Whether Young's amended complaint stated a § 1983 claim when it identified no individual defendant and alleged no conduct violating his constitutional rights.
- Whether dismissal should be without prejudice and treated as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Owens v. Scott Cnty. Jail, 328 F.3d 1026, 1027 (8th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- LaDeaux v. Woodbury Cnty. Jail, 857 F. App'x 892, 893 (8th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Gonzalez v. United States, 23 F.4th 788, 789-91 (8th Cir. 2022)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…