Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas affirmed the Social Security Administration Commissioner’s denial of Matthew Snow’s application for disability benefits. The court held that the ALJ properly evaluated the opinions of treating therapist APRN Danielle Jenkins and that the decision was supported by substantial evidence.
Holdings
- The ALJ did not err in finding Jenkins's opinions unpersuasive because the ALJ identified adequate support in the record, including inconsistencies with Jenkins's treatment notes and examinations, Snow's reported improvement, and Snow's activities of daily living.
- The Commissioner's decision denying benefits was supported by substantial evidence and applied proper legal standards.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ properly evaluated and explained the reasons for finding Danielle Jenkins's opinions regarding Snow's mental limitations unpersuasive.
- Whether substantial evidence supported the Commissioner's final decision denying disability benefits.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (9)
- Brown v. Colvin, 825 F.3d 936, 939(followed)
- Halverson v. Astrue, 600 F.3d 922, 929(followed)
- Slusser v. Astrue, 557 F.3d 923, 925(followed)
- Milam v. Colvin, 794 F.3d 978, 983(followed)
- Long v. Chater, 108 F.3d 185, 187(followed)
- Prosch v. Apfel, 201 F.3d 1010, 1013-14(followed)
- House v. Astrue, 500 F.3d 741, 744(followed)
- Duvall v. Bisignano, No. 4:25-cv-00120 KGB-PSH, 2025 WL 1812626, n.6 (E.D. Ark. July 1, 2025)(followed)
- Locher v. Sullivan, 968 F.2d 725, 728(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…