Joseph Amey, as an individual, and Warren Amey, as an individual v. Andrew Patterson, as an individual, Andrew Falvey, as an individual, Najee Burge, as an individual, and County of Sacramento, as a municipal corporation

Summary

The parties stipulate to, and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California orders, a 90-day modification of the scheduling deadlines in Joseph Amey and Warren Amey v. Andrew Patterson, et al. The order extends fact discovery to April 14, 2026, expert disclosures to May 15, 2026, supplemental expert disclosures to June 15, 2026, and the dispositive motion deadline to September 14, 2026.

Holdings

1. The parties established good cause for modifying the operative scheduling order, and the court granted the stipulated request.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the parties demonstrated good cause to modify the operative scheduling order and extend the fact-discovery, expert-disclosure, and dispositive-motion deadlines.

Disposition

other