Hurtado v. Sylvan

Hurtado · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · March 7, 2023 · No. 2:21-cv-00888-JDP (PC)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California orders plaintiff Angel Hurtado to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to file a required status report. The court continues the initial scheduling conference, sets a deadline for the status report and response, and warns that noncompliance may result in a recommendation of dismissal for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders.

Holdings

  1. A district court may dismiss an action for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders or local rules, although involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should require plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the court's order requiring a status report.
  2. Whether failure to comply with the show-cause order could support a recommendation that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…