Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California orders plaintiff Angel Hurtado to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to file a required status report. The court continues the initial scheduling conference, sets a deadline for the status report and response, and warns that noncompliance may result in a recommendation of dismissal for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders.
Holdings
- A district court may dismiss an action for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders or local rules, although involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should require plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the court's order requiring a status report.
- Whether failure to comply with the show-cause order could support a recommendation that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…