Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in a Social Security appeal. The court denied Kristin Watson’s motion for summary judgment, granted the Commissioner’s cross-motion, affirmed the Commissioner’s decision, and directed the Clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- Plaintiff did not have to corroborate her alleged pain with objective medical findings, but she was required to demonstrate that the impairment was medically ascertained.
- The ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff's subjective complaints and did not improperly discredit her testimony.
- The findings and recommendations were supported by the record and proper analysis and were adopted in full; Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was denied, Defendant's motion was granted, and the Commissioner's decision was affirmed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff's subjective complaints and testimony concerning the severity of her symptoms.
- Whether the Commissioner's decision should be affirmed after de novo review of the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (1)
- Bunnell v. Sullivan, 947 F.2d 341, 347-48 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…