Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted findings and recommendations in an immigration detainee's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas proceeding. The court denied the respondent's motion to dismiss, granted the petition, and ordered a bond hearing before an immigration judge within 30 days, requiring the respondent to justify continued detention by clear and convincing evidence or release the petitioner under appropriate supervision.
Holdings
- The motion to dismiss was denied.
- The petition for a writ of habeas corpus was granted, and the respondent was directed to provide A.E. with a bond hearing before an immigration judge within thirty days of service of the order.
- At the bond hearing, the respondent must justify A.E.'s continued detention by clear and convincing evidence; alternatively, A.E. must be released under appropriate conditions of supervision.
- A certificate of appealability is not required if a notice of appeal is filed because the detention challenged does not arise from process issued by a state court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the respondent's motion to dismiss the § 2241 habeas petition should be denied.
- Whether A.E. was entitled to habeas relief requiring a bond hearing before an immigration judge.
- Whether the government must justify A.E.'s continued immigration detention by clear and convincing evidence at that hearing.
- Whether a certificate of appealability was required for an appeal from this federal immigration-detention habeas proceeding.
Disposition
granted
Cases Cited (3)
- Forde v. U.S. Parole Commission, 114 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Ojo v. INS, 106 F.3d 680, 681-682 (5th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Bradshaw v. Story, 86 F.3d 164, 166 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…