Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted defendants’ motions to dismiss Accuire LLC’s first amended complaint without leave to amend. The court held that Accuire’s fraud and conspiracy-to-commit-fraud claims were barred by California’s three-year statute of limitations, concluding that the allegations and related court filings established inquiry notice by November 2019 at the latest. The action concerned an allegedly inaccurate audit and an undisclosed conflict of interest involving defendants Vensure Employer Services Inc. and Meredith CPAs P.C.
Holdings
- Accuire's claims against Vensure and Meredith were barred by California's three-year statute of limitations because the alleged fraud occurred in 2018 and Accuire was on inquiry notice of its potential claims no later than November 14, 2019.
- Neither delayed discovery nor fraudulent concealment saved Accuire's claims because Accuire's own allegations and filings established inquiry notice of a potential claim by November 14, 2019.
- Further leave to amend was denied because Accuire had already been given an opportunity to amend and the judicially noticeable filings made clear that further amendment would be futile.
Questions Presented
- Whether Accuire's fraud and conspiracy-to-commit-fraud claims were barred by California's three-year statute of limitations.
- Whether the delayed discovery or fraudulent-concealment doctrines tolled or otherwise avoided the statute of limitations.
- Whether the first amended complaint should be dismissed without further leave to amend because amendment would be futile.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (19)
- N. Star Int'l v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'n, 720 F.2d 578, 581 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984)(followed)
- U.S. ex rel. Chunie v. Ringrose, 788 F.2d 638, 643 n.2 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Associated Gen. Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 526 (1983)(followed)
- Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 688-89 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- G&G Prods. LLC v. Rusic, 902 F.3d 940, 946 (9th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Avanir Pharms., Inc., No. 22-cv-01026-DOC-KES, 2022 WL 17220647, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 19.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.