Ahmad Rasha Fuller v. Warden

No. 2:25-cv-0781-DC-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2025) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · August 19, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-0781-DC-CKD P

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California vacated its prior findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of Ahmad Rasha Fuller's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. The court granted Fuller leave to file a Second Amended Petition within 45 days and denied his requests for appointment of counsel without prejudice. The order also directed the Clerk to provide Fuller with the appropriate habeas corpus application form.

Holdings

  1. The court vacated the pending findings and recommendations because Fuller's statement regarding the recent denial of state-court review warranted an opportunity to file a further amended federal petition.
  2. Fuller's requests for appointment of counsel were denied without prejudice because there is no absolute right to counsel in habeas proceedings and the court did not find that the interests of justice presently required appointment.
  3. Fuller was granted 45 days to file a second amended petition using the court-provided habeas form, with failure to do so resulting in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should vacate its recommendation of summary dismissal for failure to exhaust in light of Fuller's statement that state-court review had recently been denied.
  2. Whether Fuller was entitled to appointment of counsel in the § 2254 proceeding.
  3. Whether Fuller should be granted leave to file a further amended habeas petition.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 515-16 (1982)(followed)
  • O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…