Summary
The United States Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing Hussein Ali’s civil rights action against Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC without prejudice. The recommendation is based on Ali’s failure to comply with a court order and Eastern District of California Local Rule 183(b) by failing to maintain a current address, as well as his failure to oppose the pending motion to dismiss. The recommendation applies the factors governing dismissal for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Holdings
- Dismissal without prejudice was appropriate because Plaintiff failed to maintain a current address, failed to comply with the court's informational order and Local Rule 183(b), and failed to prosecute the action.
- Defendant's pending motion to dismiss should be denied as moot because the action should be dismissed without prejudice on independent procedural grounds.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Plaintiff failed to comply with a court order and Local Rule 183(b) by failing to maintain a current address and failed to prosecute the action.
- Whether Defendant's pending motion to dismiss should be denied as moot following the recommended dismissal.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-43 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962)(followed)
- Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…