Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California addresses plaintiff Rohullah Allahyar’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court finds that the application does not sufficiently demonstrate inability to pay, grants plaintiff 30 days to pay the filing and administrative fees or submit a complete renewed application, and warns that failure to do so may result in dismissal.
Holdings
- An IFP applicant must provide sufficient information to demonstrate inability to pay court costs while still affording the necessities of life; plaintiff's affidavit did not satisfy that requirement because it disclosed $800 per week in take-home wages and provided no expense information.
- When an IFP application inadequately demonstrates indigency, the court may give the applicant a specified period to pay the required fees or submit a renewed application containing sufficient information.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's IFP affidavit adequately demonstrated an inability to pay the filing and administrative fees while still affording the necessities of life under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
- What procedural relief should be provided when an IFP application is inadequate.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948)(followed)
- United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…