Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California reviewed the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Andrea Macias’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The court found the administrative record incomplete and identified unresolved conflicts and ambiguities concerning medical opinions and the claimant’s physical and mental impairments. It granted both parties’ summary judgment motions in part, vacated the Commissioner’s decision, and remanded for further proceedings and development of the record.
Holdings
- Remand for an award of benefits was not appropriate because the administrative record was incomplete and contained unresolved conflicts and ambiguities concerning both Plaintiff's physical and mental impairments.
- Further administrative proceedings were required to develop the record concerning Plaintiff's physical limitations and mental impairments.
- Conflicts between the State agency medical consultants' functional assessments and Dr. Romanowski's more restrictive assessment could not be resolved on the incomplete record and precluded an immediate award of benefits.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Commissioner's second unfavorable disability decision should be remanded for an award of benefits or for further administrative proceedings after the parties agreed that the ALJ committed legal error.
- Whether the record was sufficiently developed and free from conflicts and ambiguities to permit the court to credit improperly rejected evidence as true and direct an award of benefits.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (24)
- Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467, 470 (1986)(followed)
- Washington State Department of Social and Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, 537 U.S. 371, 375 (2003)(followed)
- Howard ex rel. Wolff v. Barnhart, 341 F.3d 1006, 1011 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Andrews v. Shalala, 53 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1111 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971)(followed)
- Widmark v. Barnhart, 454 F.3d 1063, 1066 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Desrosiers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 846 F.2d 573, 576 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Jones v. Heckler, 760 F.2d 993, 995 (9th Cir. 1985)(followed)
- Edlund v. Massanari, 253 F.3d 1152, 1156 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.