Anthony J. Davis v. Tuolumne County, et al.

Summary

The court directs the Clerk to randomly assign a district judge and recommends that the action proceed only on the plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendant Hurtado. It further recommends dismissal of all other claims and defendants for failure to state a cognizable claim, and advises the plaintiff regarding objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

Holdings

1. The magistrate judge recommended that the action proceed only on Plaintiff's retaliation claim against Defendant Hurtado and that all other claims and defendants be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Plaintiff's first amended complaint stated any cognizable claims beyond the retaliation claim against Defendant Hurtado.
2. Whether the action should proceed solely on the retaliation claim against Hurtado and whether the remaining claims and defendants should be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim.

Disposition

other