Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations and denied Alex Aroz’s application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court declined to consider a new claim raised in the traverse, denied a certificate of appealability, and directed the Clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- The district court adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations in full after reviewing the record and finding them supported by the record and the magistrate judge's analysis.
- Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus was denied.
- The court declined to consider the new claim raised in the traverse.
- The court declined to issue a certificate of appealability because petitioner had not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations should be adopted when neither party filed objections.
- Whether petitioner was entitled to habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
- Whether the court should consider a new claim raised for the first time in the traverse.
- Whether petitioner was entitled to a certificate of appealability.
Disposition
denied
Cases Cited (2)
- Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…