Summary
The United States Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing David Bennett’s action against the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other defendants without prejudice. The recommendation is based on failure to state a claim and failure to file an amended complaint within the time allowed by the court’s June 3, 2025 order, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 110.
Holdings
- Dismissal without prejudice was warranted because plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or seek additional time after being ordered to do so, and the relevant dismissal factors supported that result.
- Dismissal for failure to state a claim was warranted for the reasons stated in the district court's June 3, 2025 order.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff failed to state a claim.
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 110 because plaintiff failed to comply with the order requiring an amended complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 643 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…