Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations and dismissed Steven Bradley’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition without prejudice. The dismissal was based on failure to prosecute and failure to obey court orders, and the court declined to issue a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- The petition was properly dismissed without prejudice because petitioner failed to comply with the screening order requiring an amended petition and failed to prosecute the action.
- A certificate of appealability should not issue because petitioner made no showing that reasonable jurists would find the court's procedural ruling debatable.
Questions Presented
- Whether the petition should be dismissed without prejudice because petitioner failed to prosecute the action and failed to obey the court's order requiring an amended petition.
- Whether a certificate of appealability should issue after the petition was dismissed on procedural grounds.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Rosas v. Nielsen, 428 F.3d 1229, 1233 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)(followed)
- Murray v. Schriro, 745 F.3d 984, 1002 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…