Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order based on a finding of sufficient diligence and good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4). The order extends expert disclosure, discovery, motion, final pretrial conference, and jury trial deadlines, while leaving all other provisions unchanged.
Holdings
- Defendants demonstrated sufficient diligence and good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) to warrant modification of the scheduling order.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendants established good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) to modify the scheduling order.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.3d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…