Summary
The document is findings and recommendations from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California concerning a state prisoner’s request for transfer. The court construed the request as a motion for injunctive relief and recommended denial because the alleged conduct was not sufficiently related to the claims in the underlying § 1983 action.
Holdings
- The request for transfer was properly construed as a motion for injunctive relief.
- The motion for injunctive relief should be denied because plaintiff did not demonstrate a relationship between the injuries and conduct alleged in the motion and the claims on which the action proceeds.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's request for transfer should be construed as a motion for injunctive relief.
- Whether injunctive relief is available when the injuries and conduct alleged in the motion are unrelated to the claims asserted in the underlying complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Pac. Radiation Oncology, LLC v. Queen’s Medical Center, 810 F.3d 631, 636 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…