Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted Defendant Robert Middleman’s motion to stay the case under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. § 3932. The court held that his commanding officer’s memorandum satisfied the statutory documentation requirements and stayed the action until February 1, 2026.
Holdings
- Middleman was entitled to a mandatory stay because his submissions stated how his current military duties materially affected his ability to appear and stated that military leave was not authorized.
- The absence of an express statement that remote video participation was infeasible and the plaintiffs' asserted prejudice did not defeat the stay.
Questions Presented
- Whether Middleman satisfied the documentation requirements for a mandatory stay under 50 U.S.C. § 3932(b)(2).
- Whether the court could deny or limit the stay because the commanding officer's memorandum did not expressly address remote participation in a video deposition or because of potential prejudice to the plaintiffs.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Brewster v. Sun Tr. Mortg., Inc., 742 F.3d 876, 878 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Boone v. Lightner, 319 U.S. 561, 575 (1943)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…