Christopher Eduardo Sanchez v. Felipe Fernandez, et al.

No. 2:25-cv-02445 CKD (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sept. 22, 2025) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · September 24, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-02445 CKD (PS)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants Christopher Eduardo Sanchez's application to proceed in forma pauperis in a civil rights action arising from a motorcycle accident and alleged conduct by a California Highway Patrol officer. The court finds that the complaint states cognizable federal and state claims and orders service on Officer Felipe Fernandez and the California Highway Patrol. The order directs the United States Marshal and the plaintiff to complete specified service-related steps.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted because he submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that he was unable to prepay fees and costs or provide security.
  2. For purposes of screening, plaintiff stated cognizable claims, so the action was not dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
  3. Service was appropriate on CHP Officer Felipe Fernandez and the California Highway Patrol, and the United States Marshal was directed to serve the process without prepayment of costs.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff demonstrated inability to prepay fees or provide security sufficient to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
  2. Whether plaintiff's complaint stated cognizable claims for purposes of screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
  3. Whether service should be ordered on CHP Officer Felipe Fernandez and the California Highway Patrol.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 967 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 & n.7 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 514 (2002)(limited)
  • Mollett v. Netflix, Inc., 795 F.3d 1062, 1065 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-57 (2007)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…