Christy Phillips v. State of California, et al.

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations after no party filed objections. The court declined supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims, granted Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to remand, and remanded the case to the Sacramento County Superior Court.

Holdings

1. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations in full.
2. The district court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.
3. The court granted plaintiff's unopposed motion to remand and remanded the action to the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations when no party filed objections.
2. Whether the district court should decline supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.
3. Whether plaintiff's unopposed motion to remand should be granted.

Disposition

remanded