Summary
The court recommends dismissing the plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. The recommendation follows the plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint after the court found that his original complaint stated no cognizable claims.
Holdings
- Dismissal without prejudice was appropriate because plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond after being ordered to do so and warned that noncompliance could result in dismissal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 110 because plaintiff failed to prosecute the action and failed to comply with the screening order.
- Whether the five-factor dismissal framework and available less drastic alternatives supported dismissal.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 643 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Leon v. IDX Systems Corp., 464 F.3d 951, 961 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…