Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted Deli Chen and Huijuan Chen's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court held that ICE unlawfully re-detained the petitioners without complying with applicable regulatory requirements concerning changed circumstances, notice, and an informal interview, and ordered their immediate release under their prior orders of supervision.
Holdings
- When ICE revokes release under 8 C.F.R. §§ 241.13(i) and 241.4(l), it must establish changed circumstances showing a significant likelihood that removal may occur in the reasonably foreseeable future. Respondents failed to satisfy that burden.
- ICE must comply with the regulatory revocation procedures, including notice of the reasons for revocation and a prompt informal interview allowing the noncitizen to respond. Respondents failed to show compliance with those requirements.
- Petitioners' re-detention was unlawful, and immediate release under the conditions of their most recent orders of supervision was warranted.
Questions Presented
- Whether ICE unlawfully re-detained Petitioners after release under orders of supervision without establishing changed circumstances creating a significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future as required by 8 C.F.R. §§ 241.13(i) and 241.4(l).
- Whether ICE unlawfully re-detained Petitioners without providing the required notice of the reasons for revocation and prompt informal interviews.
- Whether Petitioners were entitled to immediate release under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
- Whether Petitioners could seek attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (14)
- Yan-Ling X. v. Lyons, No. 1:25-cv-01412-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3123793 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2025)(followed)
- Hoac v. Becerra, No. 2:25-cv-01740-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 1993771 (E.D. Cal. July 16, 2025)(followed)
- United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954)(followed)
- Rombot v. Souza, 296 F. Supp. 3d 383 (D. Mass. 2017)(followed)
- Haoud v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 201 (1st Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)(distinguished)
- Nguyen v. Hyde, 788 F. Supp. 3d 144 (D. Mass. 2025)(followed)
- Escalante v. Noem, No. 9:25-CV-00182-MJT, 2025 WL 2206113 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2025)(followed)
- Roble v. Bondi, No. 25-CV-3196(followed)
- Abuelhawa v. Noem, No. 4:25-CV-04128, 2025 WL 2937692 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 16, 2025)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…