DePonte v. Stohl, et al.

Summary

The document contains Findings and Recommendations in which the court recommends denying as moot David Arthur DePonte’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Defendants reported that the settlement payment was processed and paid, and Plaintiff did not file a reply or withdraw the motion by the court-ordered deadline. The recommendations were issued subject to objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 304(b).

Holdings

1. The motion to enforce the settlement agreement should be denied as moot because Defendants represented that the settlement funds had been paid and Plaintiff did not contest that representation.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Plaintiff's motion to enforce the settlement agreement should be denied as moot after Defendants represented that the settlement payment had been made and Plaintiff failed to contest that representation.

Disposition

other