Dias v. Avila

Dias · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · March 4, 2025 · No. 1:24-cv-00354-KES-SAB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recommends dismissing Sean Dias’s pro se civil rights action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 110. The recommendation is based on Plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint after being granted leave to amend and warned that noncompliance could result in dismissal.

Holdings

  1. A federal court may involuntarily dismiss an action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) when a litigant fails to prosecute the action or fails to comply with a court order, and dismissal may be imposed sua sponte under appropriate circumstances.
  2. Dismissal with prejudice was warranted because the Rule 41(b) factors supported dismissal and the district court had expressly warned plaintiff that failure to timely amend could result in dismissal with prejudice.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.
  2. Whether the relevant Rule 41(b) dismissal factors support dismissal after the plaintiff failed to amend despite an express warning that noncompliance could result in dismissal with prejudice.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (11)

  • Applied Underwriters v. Lichtenegger, 913 F.3d 884, 889 (9th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Applied Underwriters v. Lichtenegger, 913 F.3d 884, 890 (9th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130-31 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000)(considered)
  • Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 644 (9th Cir. 2002)(considered)
  • Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40, 57 (1968)(followed)
  • Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…