Diaz v. Samaloson

Diaz · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · June 11, 2025 · No. 2:24-cv-2915-JDP (P)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California orders petitioner Juan Ramon Diaz to show cause within twenty-one days why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute after he failed to respond to respondent's motion to dismiss. The court also directs petitioner to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within the same period and warns that failure to comply will result in dismissal.

Holdings

  1. A federal court may dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders or local rules, including sua sponte dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) under appropriate circumstances.
  2. Immediate dismissal was not ordered; petitioner was given twenty-one days to show cause and to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition, with notice that failure to respond would result in dismissal.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court may dismiss a case for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders or local rules.
  2. Whether petitioner should be required to show cause and respond to respondent's motion to dismiss before the court considers dismissal.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (2)

  • Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…