Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California ordered pro se Plaintiff Dolores Lucero to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint by the court-ordered deadline. The court stated that Plaintiff could respond by filing a compliant First Amended Complaint within 14 days and warned that failure to respond would result in a recommendation of dismissal.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff should be required to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with the court's prior order.
- Whether the filing of unresolved objections or motions for reconsideration excused Plaintiff's obligation to comply with the amended-complaint deadline.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Hill v. Newsom, 2025 WL 1531435, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 29, 2025)(followed)
- Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Oregon v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…