Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in a prisoner civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court dismissed the action without prejudice after plaintiff failed to file objections.
Holdings
- When reviewing a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, factual findings are presumed correct and legal conclusions are reviewed de novo.
- The district court may adopt the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations in full when they are supported by the record and the magistrate judge's analysis and no objections warrant a different result.
- Service of documents at the record address of a party is fully effective when the party has a responsibility to keep the court apprised of a current address.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations should be adopted when plaintiff filed no objections.
- What standard of review applies to the magistrate judge's factual findings and legal conclusions.
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir.)(followed)
- Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…