Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted counsel’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a remand and subsequent award of past-due Social Security benefits. The court approved a gross fee award of $22,000 and directed counsel to refund the previously awarded $7,000 in EAJA fees to the plaintiff. The court found the requested fee reasonable based on the representation, result achieved, hours worked, and absence of dilatory or substandard conduct.
Holdings
- A court may approve a contingency-fee award for successful representation of a Social Security claimant when the award does not exceed 25% of past-due benefits and is reasonable in light of the representation and result achieved.
- A comparatively high effective hourly rate does not by itself make a contingency-fee award unreasonable because the lodestar is only a guidepost in § 406(b) contingency-fee matters and may not fully reflect the risk assumed by counsel.
- The motion for § 406(b) fees was granted for a gross award of $22,000, and counsel was required to remit the previously awarded $7,000 in EAJA fees directly to Plaintiff upon receipt.
Questions Presented
- Whether counsel's requested $22,000 attorney-fee award was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
- Whether the requested fee, although producing an effective hourly rate of $711.97, was an impermissible windfall or otherwise excessive.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002)(followed)
- Hern v. Barnhart, 262 F. Supp. 2d 1033, 1037 (N.D. Cal. 2003)(followed)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1148-49 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)(followed)
- Vazquez v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:17-CV-1646-JLT, 2020 WL 2793059, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 29, 2020)(followed)
- Ortega v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:12-cv-01030-AWI-SAB, 2015 WL 5021646, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2015)(followed)
- Thomas v. Colvin, No. 1:11-cv-01291-SKO, 2015 WL 1529331, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2015)(followed)
- Boyle v. Colvin, No. 1:12-cv-00954-SMS, 2013 WL 6712552, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2013)(followed)
- Jamieson v. Astrue, No. 1:09-cv-00490-LJO-DLB, 2011 WL 587096, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2011)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…