Emerson Robert Gaitan v. Macomber et al.

No. 1:25-cv-00915-JLT-HBK (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2025) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · December 18, 2025 · No. 1:25-cv-00915-JLT-HBK

Summary

The United States Magistrate Judge recommends that Emerson Robert Gaitan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Macomber and other defendants be dismissed without prejudice. The recommendation is based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with orders concerning his application to proceed in forma pauperis and his failure to prosecute the action. The document applies Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), Eastern District of California Local Rule 110, and the Ninth Circuit’s dismissal-factor test.

Holdings

  1. A court may involuntarily dismiss an action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 110 when a plaintiff repeatedly fails to obey court orders and prosecute the action, and the applicable dismissal factors support that sanction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 110 because Plaintiff failed to comply with court orders.
  2. Whether the five Henderson factors support involuntary dismissal for failure to prosecute and failure to obey court orders.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (13)

  • Applied Underwriters v. Lichtenegger, 913 F.3d 884, 889 (9th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Thompson v. Housing Auth., City of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-62 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130-33 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423-24 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • In re Approval of the Judicial Emergency Declared in the Eastern District of California, 956 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40, 57 (1968)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Air W., 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…