Etuate Sekona v. R. Perez

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted in full the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations concerning Etuate Sekona’s request for a temporary restraining order. The court denied the motion because it was procedurally deficient, lacked merit, and did not establish extraordinary circumstances or irreparable injury.

Holdings

1. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations in full after conducting de novo review under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
2. Plaintiff's construed motion for a temporary restraining order was denied because the request was procedurally deficient under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 and did not establish extraordinary circumstances or irreparable injury warranting relief.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Plaintiff's construed motion for a temporary restraining order should be adopted after de novo review.
2. Whether Plaintiff's request satisfied the procedural and substantive requirements for temporary injunctive relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65.

Disposition

other