Summary
The document is findings and recommendations by a United States Magistrate Judge in a § 1983 action brought by a civil detainee against officials of Coalinga State Hospital. The court recommends dismissal with prejudice for failure to state a claim, failure to obey court orders, and failure to prosecute, based on the plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint or otherwise communicate with the court.
Holdings
- The allegations that replacement furniture would cause discomfort, reduce storage space, and reduce privacy did not plausibly show punishment or a substantial risk of serious harm, and therefore did not state a cognizable Fourteenth Amendment conditions-of-confinement claim.
- Plaintiff was not entitled to injunctive relief because he failed to show a real and immediate direct injury or a likelihood of future injury from the furniture replacement.
- Dismissal with prejudice was the appropriate sanction because Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint after repeated extensions and explicit warnings, and the relevant dismissal factors supported dismissal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint stated a cognizable Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim based on the planned installation of Norix furniture at a civil detention facility.
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to prospective injunctive or declaratory relief.
- Whether dismissal with prejudice was appropriate for failure to obey court orders and failure to prosecute after Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint despite repeated extensions and warnings.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (34)
- Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)(followed)
- Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 572 F.3d 677, 681 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Moss v. U.S. Secret Service, 572 F.3d 962, 969 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 25 (1991)(followed)
- Holley v. California Department of Corrections, 599 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 165–66 (1985)(followed)
- Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 92 (1989)(followed)
- Hartmann v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, 707 F.3d 1114, 1127 (9th Cir. 2013)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 34.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…